|
Sat Mar 13, 2010 at 11:12:44 AM EST
|
| What I'm most curious of is why fantasy is considered a pulp literature. I had to write paper writing on literature yesterday for my custom writing serviceand I decided to make this question my topic. Surprisingly enough, but just those who should understand much about literature (I mean philologists) are the main supporters of this belief. If we ask ourselves what is the nature, the essence of every literature we will find that almost every literature is designed to display human feelings, emotions, fate. Fantasy literature speaks of the same things as normal one, but as opposed to ordinary fiction it can put the examined people into extraordinary conditions, and model other forms of morality, social system and even history. Fantasy is like a clay mould, a form. You can put whatever you want there. And like any other literature, only 10% of sources are worth reading while other is crap. I consider it normal. Hope, the customer of my writing service would agree with me. |
| jill80leonard :: curious of is why fantasy is considered a pulp literature |
|
|
|
